Arthur Stansbury’s original 1828 text with Introduction and Conclusion, including 332 Questions/Answers on the Constitution with step by step commentary on all of the important features of “a government of law and not of men”, is one of the fundamental text that we will be using for leadership development and Constitutional reasoning at the Samuel Adams Center for Political Science.
I firmly believe if we had continued to use this Catechism on the Constitution to this very day we would not have the UN, we would not have obumer-care, we would not be dealing with much of what we are. So just as a slight introduction I want to share the summary of what Stansbury wrote to the children of the day. Continue reading →
The critical mass of what we are seeing played out in the present Paul Ryan Health Bill debacle is absolutely easy to understand if…. One has paid any remote attention to ‘treaties’ and UN requirements. Now this commentary is not conspiracy theory junk. In my seminar “From Covenant to The Present Constitution: The Tale of Two Constitutions” I show in detail from the State Department web site that we are entangled to the tune of about 10,000 treaties and ‘executive agreements.’ George Washington, in his Farewell Address warned us not to get captured and enslaved this way.
I’m going to keep this commentary short. Those that know me are rolling on the floor laughing! The simple analysis on why we ended up with what I call Congress Care (obama-care) in the first place begins in 2001. Yes, 2001 with a UN report by none other than – “the UN committee that monitors compliance with the Race Convention (CERD).” Continue reading →
A dear friend has placed this Open Letter to Congress and President Trump. I ask if I would be OK to post here since the Col. does not have a blog or web site. The ‘Roger’ was given. My analysis of this letter is that it is the common plea of 1776 to and against King George. Others may have asked all that is articulated here but this is a impassioned plea for action regarding valid assertions and charges. With that from Col. Loomis: Dear Congress and President Trump;
Please help me get this all straight in my mind:
All of these violations are covered in the US Constitution, 1798 Aliens and Sedition Acts, and other numerous laws of the USA. Editor’s note: Lower case nouns and pronouns are intentional to indicate enemies, possible enemies, and traitors of the State. Continue reading →
With all that we have seen occur at the national level over the last, let’s say “50 years,” it became obvious to me that the nation is not being governed by Foundational Principles. I came to this conclusion a long time ago but could not put my finger on it other then what I’ve discussed in my presentation “From Covenant to the Present Constitution (The Tale of Two Constitutions).” Yet that is a complex answer to what I think many are looking for in a simple rational. With how the national government is acting one has to wonder if anyone knows how to govern? My conclusion is ‘NO’ because they are not functioning as intended under Federalism. As I mention next, we have been functioning as a national constitutional fascist system since 1913. That sounds harsh but, when you look at the discussions of the Federalists and Anti-federalists in comparison to early 20th Century amendments and institutionalization of government. Well, the result is what the Anti-federalist predicted in No. 3, 7 and 9.
Ok, so I’m going to attempt to keep this simple and not the 20,000 words that I could write on this topic. In Particular I’m going to let Madison and several of the other Founders give the details with my, hopefully, slight interjection. Let’s just for a moment look at the turn of events after the Civil War amendment debacle. I’m not going to go retroactive to that point but I will take us back just over 100 years and what I’ve been discussing on my radio program regarding Edward House and his pseudo auto-biography “Philip Dru: Administrator.” Continue reading →